首页> 外文OA文献 >Studi Registrasi Point Cloud pada Pemrosesan Data Terrestrial Laser Scanner (Tls) (Studi Kasus : Jembatan Gading Batavia, Kelapa Gading, Jakarta Utara)
【2h】

Studi Registrasi Point Cloud pada Pemrosesan Data Terrestrial Laser Scanner (Tls) (Studi Kasus : Jembatan Gading Batavia, Kelapa Gading, Jakarta Utara)

机译:地面激光扫描仪(Tls)数据处理中点云配准的研究(案例研究:北雅加达的加丁加丁桥,加拉帕加丁)

摘要

In measurement method by using Terestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) technology, registration process hugely affected in determining the quality of geometry model and the accuracy of data produced. If once the registration is good, the geometry shape and measurement dimension of an object observed will reflect the real condition and also data accuracy will pass tolerance accuracy that has been determined.In this research, Terrestrial Laser Scanner measurement method used for scrutinizing of Gading Batavia Bridge located on Gading Batavia street, Kelapa Gading, East Jakarta. Acquisition of the data processed with Leica Scan Station C10 whereas Cyclone Version 8.1 used as data processor. Acquisition of field data and data processing executed into two methods, target to target registration method and cloud to cloud registration method.This research results Gading Batavia Bridge model space for each measurement method. Both methods show different RMS score, 0.0015 m for target to target registration method and 0.009 m for cloud to cloud registration method. Examination of model space for each method executed by comparing the distance between the bridge of Electronic Total Station result. Average error term of the comparison the distance between the bridge through both methods are 0.00581m for target to target method and 0.0084 m for cloud to cloud method.
机译:在使用陆地激光扫描仪(TLS)技术进行测量的方法中,配准过程对确定几何模型的质量和所生成数据的准确性有很大影响。如果配准良好,则观察到的物体的几何形状和测量尺寸将反映实际情况,并且数据精度也将通过已确定的公差精度。在本研究中,用于仔细检查Gading Batavia的地面激光扫描仪测量方法位于加丁巴达维亚大街上的桥梁,东雅加达Kelapa Gading。采集使用Leica Scan Station C10处理的数据,而Cyclone版本8.1用作数据处理器。实地数据的获取和数据处理分为目标对目标注册方法和云对云注册方法两种方法。两种方法均显示不同的RMS得分,目标到目标配准方法为0.0015 m,云到云配准方法为0.009 m。通过比较电子全站仪结果之间的距离来检验每种方法执行的模型空间。比较这两种方法之间的距离的平均误差项,目标到目标方法为0.00581m,云到云方法为0.0084m。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号